Law of the Land and Law of the Sea

“The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism—ownership of Government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. The second truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if its business system does not provide employment and produce and distribute goods in such a way as to sustain an acceptable standard of living.” 

—Franklin D Roosevelt

 Legal fiction 

       There are two main types of laws in this world, the law of the land (Common Law) and the law of the sea (Universal Commercial Code (UCC), Maritime Admiralty Law). In order to conduct business on an international basis, one country trading with another, a strict business code was adopted based on Roman Vatican Canon Law. 

       Ships would traverse the globe exchanging goods under this system, backed up by naval pursuits if the law wasn’t adhered to and contracts weren’t fulfilled. In order to do business fluently under UCC law a legal fiction had to be created so the flesh and blood human could conduct business with corporations under the Jurisdiction of its statutes. This allowed things to be done in law, which, without the legal fiction, would not be possible. 

       Throughout the 19th Century corporations expanded their influence, dominating commerce, it was therefore necessary to incorporate the common man into this system, turning him into a commodity. An ingenious but deceptive method was adopted by those countries participating in this trading strategy, this was the main reason why the birth certificate was created. 

       When you are born, your parents unwittingly register your birth and with this registration the government creates a company under the same name e.g. “PETER PAN”. From that moment on all official documents denoting the legal fictitious company bearing your name will use capital letters. 

       As the company was a creation of the government it is also they that own and control it. The great deception here is that they did not tell you this; they also didn’t want you to know, so they could use this company as a tool to attach liabilities to the real you and secure future government borrowing with your legal fiction as security. 

       Most people are unaware that nearly everything has a legal fiction attached to it; the system can only survive if this is the case. You, the flesh and blood person, are not required under common law to acquiesce to the demands of a corporation, unless you have a legal binding contract with them, a contract of full disclosure where both parties are aware of all aspects of the contract and both parties have provided a valid signature. 

       Bearing in mind the majority of people are unknowingly acting for their namesake corporation which throws into question the legality over full disclosure. The corporations can only do business with the legal fiction and have no control over the real person. PETER PAN the company was created alongside the flesh and blood boy, created and named by his parents. But in the absence of the knowledge of the existence of the company, people are led to believe that everything applies to the boy. 

       When officials acting for the control system ask the question “Are you Peter Pan?” What they really mean is “Do you accept the liabilities for PETER PAN the corporation”. When you agree by saying “YES”, you are unknowingly accepting the liabilities for the corporation (person), which the control system owns and uses to establish their authority over you. 

       The government and its institutions all of which are corporations, have authority over you only by your consent. Statutes (Acts of Parliament) only apply to the legal fiction whereas common law applies to the flesh and blood human. 

       Common law is simple and has evolved over hundreds of years. You must not injure or kill anyone.  You must not steal or damage things owned by someone else.  You must be honest in your dealings and not swindle anyone.  

       Parliamentary laws are vast, an endless stream of legislative statutes designed to find new ways of extracting wealth from the common flesh and blood person through the legal fiction he is unwittingly representing, designed to keep him in perpetual debt slavery, working his entire life for a pension that vanishes on the date he goes to collect it. This transition into what is essentially a corporatocracy has been a long process. 

       British corporations, as we understand them today, came into being in 1844 with a UK Parliamentary Act allowing the corporation to define their own purpose. The power to control them passed from the government to the courts. 

       In 1855 shareholders were awarded limited liability protecting individual wealth from the consequences of their corporate behaviour.  In 1963 the D-U-N-S numbering system was introduced allocating a unique number to each business entity. With minimal effort, you can discover that political parties, government institutions and even your local police force have a D-U-N-S number, signifying a corporation. 

       When you do a search, you will discover that the House of Commons is a commercial company (number UC2279443), The Labour Party is a commercial company, the House of Lords, the United Kingdom Corporation Ltd, the Ministry of Justice, the Bank of England and every Court and Police Force up and down the country; even the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry is a company. 

       Consequently, in order to interact with all these corporations, the legal fiction attached to the individual must be created, and to survive it must also be hidden from public scrutiny.

The Vatican’s Trusts 

       We must go back a long way in history to appreciate where this all began and why it is the way it is. The Canaanite Phoenicians (1500 – 539 BC) were the pioneers of this trading system, with their vast maritime superiority; they managed to dominate commerce throughout the Mediterranean from Tyre, where Lebanon/Israel is now. With all their ships, they managed to impose tariffs and tax on commercial activity making themselves rich and feared. 

       The Phoenician alphabet is believed to have been behind all modern western alphabets, spreading into Greece and Rome through its trading activities. Alexander the Great took Tyre in 332 BC putting an end to its 1000-year maritime monopoly. It is believed by some scholars that the wealth from Phoenicia eventually moved into Venice creating another maritime trading culture, the Venetians. 

       After the decline of Rome and the transfer of power over to the Vatican the Papacy had learnt a lot about commerce and set about enslaving all of humanity by setting up a system of ownership targeting all property and souls. After the Knights Templar had been defeated at Acre, 24 miles south of Tyre in 1291, the Roman Catholic Church began to put in motion their plan to own the world. 

        In 1302 Pope Boniface VIII, through Papal bulls, created the first express trust in history, the “Unam Sanctum”, Attached to that trust were three “Cestui Que Vie” trusts, or crowns, each one targeting specific areas of ownership.     

       Nicolas V, 1455: Romanus Pontifex – 1st Testamentary Deed and Will and 1st Crown of People as Permanent Slaves.  

       Sixtus IV, 1481: Aeterni Regis – 2nd Testamentary Deed and Will and 2nd Crown over land.  

       Paul III, 1531: Convocation – 3rd Testamentary Deed and Will and 3rd Crown over Souls.  

       With these three Cestui Que Vie trusts or Papal bull crowns, the Roman Catholic Church, unchallenged, believe they have ownership, the keys to all land, bodies and souls. This is why the Pope’s crown has three tiers. All courts now operate on trust law, based on Vatican ecclesiastical canon law; they manipulate people into representing their corporate legal fiction or trust, which are essentially underpinning these three papal trusts.

The UNITED STATES CORPORATION 

       After the American Civil War, the United States was in a terrible financial mess. The international financiers had achieved one of their objectives. They either wanted the Union bankrupt or divided and controlled by themselves. 

       The Union survived but 4 years of war had taken its toll in lives and the economy. With Lincoln, out the way the international financiers offered financial help to the Union with conditions attached, they wanted to create an independent government for the ten-square mile District of Columbia, a separate entity in the host nation, like the City of London and the Vatican. This new independent government was to be a corporation under the name, THE UNITED STATES. The name is all capitals signifying a corporate legal fiction. 

       On February 21st 1871 the 41st congress passed the Act of 1871, Act titled: “An Act to provide a government for the District of Columbia.” This new corporation was owned by international bankers and the aristocracy of Europe. 

       The constitution of 1787 was rewritten with one word changed. The original constitution reads “Constitution for the United States of America”. The new one reads “CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”, all capitals signifying a corporation with the word “for” changed to “OF”. This is a constitution of a corporation dictating policy as opposed to a constitution of the people. 

       Many may still believe the President of the United States is the president of the republic, he is, in fact, the president of a corporation owned by foreign interests. This may explain why the British and the Israeli Zionists have a special relationship with the United States, they may well be its owners. 

       When the United States and Britain, under their special relationship decide to expand the influence of democracy throughout the world, in reality they are using democracy as an excuse to make the world safer for banking usury and corporate ecclesiastic commerce, helping them to gain a greater monopolistic foot hold in whatever country is next on the list, this is essentially globalization. 

       The American war machine is nothing more than a group of companies lobbying the corporate government for a greater involvement in world affairs, they profit from mass slaughter and human misery on a global scale. 

Commercial courts 

      The commercial court system has evolved from the law of the sea, Maritime Admiralty Law. A universal commercial code (UCC), designed to allow the flow of business to take place between corporations and the flesh and blood person through the deceptively created Legal fiction.  

       Going to court for any civil action is not a good idea, as the only function of a court is to judge between the two disagreeing parties, and then penalise the loser. The court is not interested in who wins or loses because the objective of the court is to make a profit as a commercial enterprise for its owners; its purpose is to acquire money from anybody who is foolish enough to attend. 

       A civil commercial court summons (which is really an invitation) to go to court, is not in your name, but in the name of the legal fiction which they are hoping to fool you into representing. Any financial institution is also a legal fiction and doesn’t really exist. 

       The modern commercial court is effectively a representation of a ship, exercising its authority under the Law of the sea. The Judge will try to entice you into representing the legal fiction by asking “is PETER PAN in court” or “are you PETER PAN”? By answering yes to this you are unwittingly accepting responsibility to represent the fictitious corporation known as PETER PAN, where liabilities will be placed upon you. 

       A recent case took place in the UK where the local council took Roger Hayes to court for failure to pay his council tax. 

       On the 11/JAN/2011 the County Court of Birkenhead conceded to the right of Roger Hayes to act as ‘third party representative’ for the legal fiction of MR ROGER HAYES. In essence, the court agreed that they were two separate entities. 

       This is the court transcript from Roger Hayes:

                Judge: Can we first find out who is in the court… is MR ROGER HAYES in the court?

       Roger: Sir, I am third party representative for MR ROGER HAYES.

       Judge: Are you MR ROGER HAYES?

       Roger: No sir, I am the third party representative for MR ROGER HAYES… you may address me as Roger.

       Judge: I will not address you as Roger, I will call you MR HAYES

       Roger: Sir, I am not MR HAYES, the court is required to address me as I request and I request that you address me as Roger. (NOTE – court protocol dictates that a defendant or respondent can be addressed the way they choose – the Judge then referred to me as ‘the gentleman’ but avoided referring to me as MR HAYES).

       Judge: If you are not MR ROGER HAYES then I will take note that MR ROGER HAYES is not represented in court.

       Roger: In that case sir, you will have to also note that the council is not represented in court.

(NOTE. This would mean that the case would have to be dismissed, finding for the defendant, because the plaintiff had not appeared) 

       Judge: I can see that the council has representation in the court.

       Roger: Then you will have to acknowledge that MR ROGER HAYES has representation in the court. We are all equal in the eyes of the law… if council has third party representation then so does MR ROGER HAYES. The council is a corporation and so is MR ROGER HAYES.

       Judge: MR ROGER HAYES is not a corporation.

       Roger: Yes it is.

       Judge: No it isn’t, it is a PERSON.

       Roger: A PERSON is a corporation.

       Judge: No it isn’t.

       Roger: Define person.

       Judge: I don’t have to.

       Roger: Then let me do it for you sir. A PERSON is a corporation (NOTE: This is defined in a law dictionary) Sir, are you familiar with the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666?

       Judge: I am familiar with many laws.

       Roger: Sir, I asked if you were familiar with the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666, if you are not Sir, then with respect you are not competent to judge in this matter and that gives rise to a claim of denial of due process.

       Judge: Let’s hear from the council.

       Roger: Sir we can only move on to the council’s presentation when the court has confirmed that MR ROGER HAYES is represented in court.

       Judge: Fine. 

       And the case continued…. with Roger Hayes acting as third-party representative for the legal fiction MR ROGER HAYES and with the judge eventually telling the council to go away and prove its case. The Judge was obviously very keen to avoid a charge of denial of due process i.e. a challenge to his competence. 

       It was much easier for him to side with Roger and pass the buck back to the council. Smart judge. It is interesting to see how the deception of the legal fiction, a corporation is vigorously upheld by court room employees, eager to impose the will of the control system, either through ignorance or a subconscious consumption of expectations of the corporate persona. 

        The TV licence In Britain, the citizens receive a demand to pay a TV licence. The demand is addressed to the legal fiction, in capital letters, not the human. This demand is optional because it is not the real you who is being billed but it is you who decide whether to pay or not. 

       As a physical being you are bound under common law but not legal statutes, common law does not demand you pay tax or a TV licence. The interesting thing here is that the legal fiction who is only a piece of paper can be considered deaf, dumb and blind and does not even own a TV set, therefore is not required to have a licence. 

       The company employed to send out demands put fear in the minds of the public by sending out vans with peculiar devices attached to the roofs, in an attempt to frighten people into paying. All you need to do is write on their envelope “NO CONTRACT – RETURN TO SENDER “. 

       There is no contract. A contract is when there is full disclosure, where both parties are aware of all aspects of the contract and both parties have provided a valid signature.

The Police 

       The Police or Policy enforcement officers have deviated from their initial role as constables, defenders and upholders of constitutional/common law, to a new dominant role as statutory tax collectors for corporate government legislation. Police forces are now commercial enterprises dedicated to creating profit; they extract our money using various forms of penalty notices and fines. 

       Police officers take an oath of office which gives them authority to uphold common law. Many police do not appreciate the difference between optional ‘Legal’ statutes and ‘Lawful’ common law requirements which are not optional and apply to us all. 

       In order for the Police officer to extract money from the public, it is essential that the officer persuades the person into representing and taking responsibility for the legal fiction of the same name. 

       His first attempt at establishing authority over you is to ask for your name. This is not an innocent question. There are many legalese questions designed to trap you into contractually representing the legal fiction, the officer may ask “Do you understand”, in legalese terms he is trying to establish authority by getting you to stand under his official capacity. 

       There are many websites dedicated to this and go into specific details on how to avoid the many pitfalls, I will only give a brief outline here.   

       An offense under common law has only been committed if there is a victim; someone killed or injured; someone who has had possessions damaged, or stolen; or someone who has been defrauded. 

       If the police officer continues pushing you to agree to pay his corporate fine, then a good question to ask might be “who is the victim?”, or “what is the charge, am I free to go?”. 

       The police officer now has a problem because you have not agreed to represent your legal fiction, binding yourself to his legal statutes. By not being aggressive or offensive, you have to be very careful not to fall under his legalese traps otherwise you become subject to his legal not lawful authority. 

       It is all a big game carefully crafted in order to extract your wealth in a perfectly “legal” way. Most governments are now corporations; we essentially live within a huge corporation. 

       Behind the scenes the global corporate control system is co-owned either at board level or at shareholder level. It could be argued that through co-ownership of all the key corporations, that the entire global structure is one giant corporation. The owners of which are likely to be the same group who own and control the major private central banks. 

       It has become virtually impossible to live a life on this planet without having some form of corporation imposing its will upon you. The course and direction of human evolution is now more or less in the hands of these giant interlocking entities. 

       Through the implementation of new legislation and corporate procedures, insurance requirements and media manipulation humanity is programmed to compete against one another for the best deck chair with the best view on the Titanic, wilfully ignorant and oblivious to the direction the ship is heading. Working hard to stoke the engines and maintain a well-oiled machine, this ship will go in one direction, the direction of greater corporate control and power consolidation into fewer hands.